The article in the NY Times, Sisters in Idiosyncracy touches on two ideas I identify with -- the draw to the D.I.Y aesthetic credo and living like a "Resident Tourist." Highlights on these two themes:"IF there is an aesthetic credo to Brooklyn and the Bay Area, it is Do It Yourself, which connotes more than using an Allen wrench from Ikea. D.I.Y. can mean everything from wearing locally designed T-shirts to attending concerts staged in someone’s warehouse apartment, to riding a bike to work," explains NOAM COHEN, NY Times.
He goes on to say....
Danny Hoch, a Brooklynite, recently performed “Taking Over,” a one-man show about gentrification, at the Berkeley Rep Theater in California. “What I see as the reason for so many NYers having come to the Bay, and so many Bay folk moving to Bklyn (tens of thousands literally),” he wrote in an e-mail message, “is that each group has become accustomed to the alienation or perceived impossibility of staying where they are.”
Someone leaving Brooklyn for the Bay Area, he said, gets “a nicer climate, laid-back vibe, better produce, California’s nature close by, and a job scene where you feel more in demand as a NYer.”
The reverse, he said, is also true.
But Mr. Hoch predicted that the transience that allows people to hop between both places so fluidly would eventually lead them away.
“Although I think each side sees the other as an amazing place to live and spend time, neither sees it as a place to actually stay forever,” he wrote. “Both are nostalgic for home.” “Each becomes the new ‘resident tourist,’ as I say in my play.”
